Jordan
Wall Ztreet Journal Wall Ztreet Journal

Jordan

Kingdom of Jordon

Title: Prayer and Eir

Read More
Market Report: The Future of Blockchain and Quantum Computing (2025-2037)
Wall Ztreet Journal Wall Ztreet Journal

Market Report: The Future of Blockchain and Quantum Computing (2025-2037)

Blockchain and Quantum Computing

The period from 2025 to 2037 is set to usher in a transformative era driven by the convergence of blockchain technology and quantum computing. This synergy will reshape various sectors, including business, finance, governance, and social interactions, fundamentally altering the global digital landscape.


Technological Advancements and Security:

By 2029, we expect the standardization of quantum-resistant cryptography, ensuring long-term blockchain security. This will be followed by the evolution of quantum-resistant smart contracts by 2030, enabling more sophisticated and secure automated agreements. The integration of quantum random number generators into blockchain consensus mechanisms by 2029 will further enhance security and fairness in blockchain operations.


Business Adoption and Efficiency:

Fortune 500 companies are projected to lead the charge in blockchain adoption, with 80% likely to implement blockchain solutions for supply chain management by 2028. This will drive improvements in efficiency, transparency, and collaboration across global business networks. Concurrently, we anticipate a 95% reduction in energy consumption of major blockchain networks by 2031, addressing environmental concerns and expanding potential applications.


Financial Systems and Economic Impact:

The rise of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) is expected to reshape the global monetary landscape by 2030, offering new tools for economic management and potentially altering international financial dynamics. By 2034, blockchain technology is projected to enable real-time, cross-border payments settled in under 0.1 seconds for 99% of global transactions. Furthermore, by 2035, we anticipate that 35% of global GDP will be stored on or transacted through blockchain systems, signaling a shift towards more transparent and traceable economic activities.


Decentralized Governance and Asset Management:

The emergence of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) built on quantum-resistant blockchains is expected to manage assets worth over $2 trillion by 2035. This represents a paradigm shift in how collective resources are managed and invested, potentially democratizing access to investment opportunities and challenging traditional corporate structures.


Digital Identity and Social Interactions:

Blockchain-based digital identity solutions are anticipated to gain widespread adoption by 2031, promising enhanced personal data control and simplified digital interactions for a majority of internet users. While less certain, the potential emergence of a major blockchain-based social media platform by 2034 could revolutionize online social interactions, content creation, and data ownership paradigms.


Civic Engagement:

The democratic process may see a significant shift with the implementation of blockchain-based voting systems in at least 15 countries by 2033, potentially increasing electoral transparency and participation.


Challenges and Opportunities:

While these developments promise increased security, transparency, and user control, the transition will face significant challenges. These include technical hurdles, regulatory considerations, scalability issues, and the need for widespread education and acceptance. Regulatory frameworks will need to evolve rapidly to keep pace with technological change, and the transition to these new systems will require adaptation across all levels of society and business.


Conclusion:

As blockchain and quantum technologies evolve and intersect, they are likely to create new synergies and opportunities, fundamentally altering how we conduct business, manage finances, participate in democracy, and interact online. The next decade will be crucial in determining the extent to which these technologies realize their transformative potential across sectors. Organizations and individuals that can successfully navigate and leverage these changes will be well-positioned to thrive in this new digital and economic paradigm, shaping the future of global interactions for generations to come.

Read More
Wall Ztreet Journal Wall Ztreet Journal

Research Report: Mining w/thout Powerful Hardware

Slimcoin

Slimcoin is a peer-to-peer cryptocurrency derived from PPCoin's and Bitcoin's designs. Proof-of-burn joins with proof-of-stake and proof-of-work to provide block generation and network security. Proof-of-work is used as a mean for generating the initial money supply. As time passes and as the network accumulates a sufficient supply of coins,
proof-of-work mining will become less necessary. Therefore, the network will rely more on proof-of-burn and proof-of-stake, the more energy efficient alternatives. Proof-of-burn is based on the idea of burning coins and generating subsequent burn hashes through a method exclusive to burn transactions. The combination of proof-of-burn, proof-of-stake, and proof-of-work strengthens the blockchain's security.

Read More
Key Issue: What is Stonehenge ?
Wall Ztreet Journal Wall Ztreet Journal

Key Issue: What is Stonehenge ?

Key Issue: What is Stonehenge ?

Its a primary economic wheel.

1933 Gold Standard Keynes

2028 Economic Crash/Prices

Proof Data Set
51°30'18.78"N 0°11'13.33"W
51°10'44.17"N 1°49'33.78"W

Read More
Stark & Starkweather
Wall Ztreet Journal Wall Ztreet Journal

Stark & Starkweather

Recommended movie: The 12th Victim

Key Issue: Is Lincoln, NE known for serial killers ?

Template

a) Charles , brother of the Zodiac

b) Stark & Stark sued the Zodiac

c) Weather - hot water, “SantaAnna” winds predicted.

d) Evidence in support of testimony given by former CEO of the holding company and member of the investment committee about 2007 Geothermal Memo

Read More
Wall Ztreet Journal Wall Ztreet Journal

Strategic Planning Assumptions: Inventory Optimization 2024-2031

1.IoT-enabled Real-time Inventory Tracking

IoT-enabled real-time inventory tracking will be standard in 90% of Fortune 500 retailers, reducing out-of-stock incidents by 65% and overstocking by 40%, outperforming traditional inventory management methods more significantly than initially expected.

(Probability: 0.80)

IoT technology is already being rapidly adopted in retail, with clear benefits in inventory management. The short timeframe and the focus on large retailers make this prediction highly plausible. The significant improvements in stock management align with the current trajectory of IoT implementations. Retailers are under increasing pressure to optimize their operations and improve customer satisfaction, making this investment a priority. The COVID-19 pandemic has also accelerated digital transformation in retail, further supporting this trend.

2. AI-driven Inventory Optimization

85% of Fortune 1000 companies will have implemented AI-driven inventory optimization solutions that reduce carrying costs by an average of 30%, despite initial skepticism about AI's ability to handle complex supply chain dynamics.

(Probability: 0.75)

AI adoption in business processes is accelerating, with inventory management being a prime candidate for optimization. The cost reduction metric is ambitious but achievable given the rapid advancements in AI capabilities. Large companies have the resources to invest in these technologies and are motivated to do so by the potential for significant cost savings. The growing availability of AI solutions specifically designed for inventory management will facilitate widespread adoption. The initial skepticism will likely be overcome as early adopters demonstrate concrete benefits.

3. Dynamic Micro-Segmentation Adoption

60% of global retailers will adopt dynamic micro-segmentation in their inventory optimization strategies, powered by AI and real-time data, leading to a 35% increase in profit margins for slow-moving items and a 25% reduction in lost sales for fast-moving items.

(Probability: 0.75)

The retail industry is increasingly data-driven, making this prediction highly plausible. Micro-segmentation offers clear benefits in terms of profitability and efficiency, aligning with retailers' goals. The technology required for this level of segmentation is rapidly maturing, making widespread adoption feasible within the timeframe. Competitive pressures in the retail sector will drive adoption as companies seek to gain an edge. The success of early adopters will likely accelerate the trend across the industry.

4. Reduction of Unplanned Downtime In Manufacturing By 25%

Predictive maintenance powered by inventory optimization AI will reduce unplanned downtime in manufacturing by 25% for early adopters, not exceeding the 30% improvement many industry experts initially projected.

(Probability: 0.75)

Predictive maintenance is a growing trend in manufacturing, with clear ROI. The integration of AI with inventory optimization creates a powerful synergy that can significantly reduce downtime. Manufacturers are increasingly recognizing the value of data-driven approaches to maintenance and inventory management. The potential for substantial cost savings and efficiency improvements will drive adoption. The projected 75% reduction, while ambitious, is achievable for early adopters who fully leverage these technologies.

5. 25% Reduction of Inventory Levels

70% of inventory optimization software will incorporate advanced scenario planning capabilities using digital twins, enabling companies to reduce inventory levels by 25% while improving service levels by 15%, challenging the traditional trade-off between inventory reduction and service improvement.

(Probability: 0.75)

Digital twin technology is gaining traction across industries, with inventory management being a prime application. The ability to simulate and optimize complex systems in real-time aligns well with the needs of inventory management. The projected improvements in both inventory reduction and service levels are ambitious but achievable with this technology. Companies are increasingly seeking ways to balance cost reduction with improved customer service, making this capability highly desirable. The growing maturity of digital twin technology will facilitate its integration into inventory optimization software.

6. Financial Optimization Algorithms & 20% Improvement in Cash flow and a 15% reduction in working capital requirements

Inventory optimization software with embedded financial optimization algorithms will be used by 80% of Fortune 500 companies, resulting in a 20% improvement in cash flow and a 15% reduction in working capital requirements, challenging traditional siloed approaches to finance and supply chain management.

(Probability: 0.70)

The integration of financial and supply chain management is a growing trend, driven by the need for more holistic business optimization. The potential for significant improvements in cash flow and working capital efficiency will make this capability highly attractive to large companies. The longer timeframe allows for the development and refinement of these complex algorithms. The trend towards digital transformation and integrated business planning supports this prediction. However, the high adoption rate and the need to overcome traditional organizational silos present challenges, hence the slightly lower probability.

7. Drones will manage 30% of last-mile deliveries.

Inventory optimization software integrated with autonomous vehicles and drones will manage 30% of last-mile deliveries for major logistics companies, reducing delivery costs by 40% and delivery times by 60%, surpassing manual optimization methods more dramatically than anticipated.

(Probability: 0.70)

The development of autonomous delivery vehicles and drones is progressing rapidly, with several companies already conducting trials. The potential for cost reduction and improved delivery times is significant, driving interest from logistics companies. The longer timeframe allows for technological maturation and regulatory adaptation. However, challenges related to public acceptance, infrastructure, and regulation may slow adoption, hence the probability of 0.70.

8. 30% Increase in Resource Efficiency

Circular economy principles integrated into inventory optimization software will help early adopters achieve a 50% reduction in waste-related costs and a 30% increase in resource efficiency, outperforming traditional linear economy models in both profitability and sustainability.

(Probability: 0.70)

The circular economy concept is gaining traction globally, driven by environmental concerns and resource scarcity. Integrating these principles into inventory optimization aligns with growing corporate sustainability initiatives. The potential for both cost reduction and improved sustainability makes this capability attractive to businesses. However, the significant changes required in business models and supply chains may slow adoption. The projected improvements are ambitious but achievable for committed early adopters, hence the probability of 0.70.

9. 75% Reduction In Counterfeit Drugs

Blockchain-based inventory tracking will be adopted by 60% of global pharmaceutical companies, reducing counterfeit drugs in the supply chain by 75%, surpassing traditional anti-counterfeiting measures.

(Probability: 0.65)

Blockchain technology offers significant potential for improving supply chain transparency and security, particularly in industries like pharmaceuticals where counterfeiting is a major issue. The longer timeframe allows for technological maturation and regulatory alignment. The potential for drastically reducing counterfeiting will drive adoption in the pharmaceutical industry. However, challenges related to industry-wide standardization and the need for significant infrastructure changes may slow adoption. The 75% reduction in counterfeiting is ambitious, contributing to the lower probability.

10. 50% of inventory optimization solutions will incorporate advanced materials science data, enabling predictive quality control that reduces defect-related returns by 70% and extends product shelf life by 30% across various industries, surpassing current quality management systems.

(Probability: 0.65)

The integration of materials science with inventory optimization represents a novel approach with significant potential benefits. The longer timeframe allows for the development of necessary technologies and data integration capabilities. The potential for reducing returns and extending shelf life offers clear financial benefits, driving interest across industries.

Jake Lebinski

Senior Director

IBIDG

———————————————————


Appendix: Inventory Optimization Software Vendors
Leaders:

SAP
Oracle
Blue Yonder (formerly JDA Software)
Manhattan Associates
Logility

Visionaries:
6. Anaplan
7. Infor
8. Arkieva
9. Llamasoft (now part of Coupa)
10. o9 Solutions
11. AIMMS
12. ToolsGroup
Challengers:
13. Kinaxis
14. RELEX Solutions
15. Netstock
16. EazyStock
17. Slimstock
18. Demand Works
19. Blue Ridge
20. Syncron
Niche Players:
21. Smart Software
22. Right Sized Inventory
23. Lokad
24. GMDH Shell
25. Inventory Planner
26. Optimum Profit
27. Leafio
28. Demand Solutions
29. John Galt Solutions
30. AGR Dynamics
31. Valogix
32. Avercast
33. Forecasty.AI
34. Streamline
35. Intuendi
36. Inventoro
37. Futurmaster
Other Notable Vendors:
38. C3 AI
39. Vanguard Software
40. Logistyx Technologies
41. E2open
42. Dynasys (QAD)
43. Epicor
44. Softeon
45. HighJump (now part of Körber)

Read More
Wall Ztreet Journal Wall Ztreet Journal

Market Report: The Future of Inventory Optimization - AI-Driven Transformation 2031-2037

Executive Summary


The inventory optimization industry is poised for a radical transformation over the next fifteen years, driven primarily by advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and its integration with other cutting-edge technologies. This report outlines the projected trajectory of the industry based on strategic planning assumptions and current trends.

By 2031, AI-powered inventory optimization systems will achieve autonomous decision-making capabilities in 60% of Fortune 500 companies, reducing human intervention in routine inventory management tasks by 90%.

These systems will not only forecast demand and optimize stock levels but will also autonomously negotiate with suppliers, adjust pricing, and reallocate inventory across multiple channels in real-time.

This level of AI autonomy will lead to a 40% reduction in overall inventory costs and a 25% improvement in customer satisfaction rates, challenging the notion that human oversight is necessary for critical supply chain decisions.

(Probability: 0.70)

Read More
Wall Ztreet Journal Wall Ztreet Journal

Research Report: Consensus Algorithms

Consensus Algorithms

Blockchain technology relies on various consensus algorithms to ensure the integrity and security of distributed ledgers. This report examines five primary consensus algorithms: Proof of Work (PoW), Proof of Stake (PoS), Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS), Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT), and Proof of Authority (PoA).

Proof of Work (PoW) is a consensus mechanism that requires network participants, known as miners, to solve complex computational puzzles to validate transactions and create new blocks. PoW secures the network by making it computationally expensive to add new blocks, thereby preventing malicious actors from easily manipulating the blockchain. Miners compete to solve a cryptographic puzzle by repeatedly hashing the block header with different nonce values until a hash below a certain target difficulty is found. The mathematical foundation of PoW relies on one-way hash functions, typically SHA-256, and the difficulty of finding specific hash outputs. The system dynamically adjusts the difficulty to maintain a consistent block time.

Proof of Stake (PoS) is an alternative consensus mechanism where validators are chosen to create new blocks based on the amount of cryptocurrency they "stake" as collateral. PoS aims to achieve consensus in a more energy-efficient manner than PoW while maintaining security through economic incentives. Validators are selected pseudo-randomly, with the probability of selection proportional to the amount of cryptocurrency they have staked. The mathematical underpinnings of PoS include cryptographic algorithms for random selection, often combined with game theory principles to ensure honest behavior through reward and punishment mechanisms.

Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) is a variant of PoS where token holders vote for a limited number of delegates responsible for validating transactions and creating blocks. DPoS aims to increase scalability and transaction speed while maintaining a degree of decentralization through the voting mechanism. In this system, token holders vote for delegates, with voting power proportional to their stake. The elected delegates then take turns producing blocks in a round-robin fashion. DPoS employs voting algorithms and reputation systems, often incorporating concepts from game theory to incentivize honest behavior among delegates.

Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) is a consensus algorithm designed to work efficiently in asynchronous systems and tolerate Byzantine faults, which include malicious or faulty nodes. PBFT ensures consensus in a distributed system even when some nodes are unreliable or potentially malicious. It achieves this through a multi-round voting process where nodes agree on the state of the system, with a supermajority (typically 2/3) required for consensus. The mathematical foundation of PBFT relies on principles from distributed systems theory and Byzantine fault tolerance, using cryptographic signatures and message authentication codes to ensure message integrity.

Proof of Authority (PoA) is a consensus mechanism where a set of pre-approved validators are responsible for creating new blocks and maintaining the network. PoA provides a highly scalable and energy-efficient consensus mechanism for permissioned blockchains. In this system, approved validators take turns producing blocks in a round-robin fashion, with their real-world identity at stake as collateral. PoA utilizes cryptographic algorithms for block production and validation, often incorporating reputation systems and time-based rotation schemes to ensure fairness and security.

—————————————————————

Updated Report: Primary Consensus Algorithms in Blockchain Technology

1. Name of Algorithm: Proof of Work (PoW)

Definition

A consensus mechanism that requires network participants (miners) to solve complex computational puzzles to validate transactions and create new blocks.

Proof of Work (PoW) is a consensus mechanism that requires network participants, known as miners, to solve complex computational puzzles to validate transactions and create new blocks. PoW secures the network by making it computationally expensive to add new blocks, thereby preventing malicious actors from easily manipulating the blockchain. Miners compete to solve a cryptographic puzzle by repeatedly hashing the block header with different nonce values until a hash below a certain target difficulty is found. The mathematical foundation of PoW relies on one-way hash functions, typically SHA-256, and the difficulty of finding specific hash outputs. The system dynamically adjusts the difficulty to maintain a consistent block time.

Key issue: What does it do? PoW secures the network by making it computationally expensive to add new blocks, preventing malicious actors from easily manipulating the blockchain.

Key Issue: How does it do it? Miners compete to solve a cryptographic puzzle by repeatedly hashing the block header with different nonce values until a hash below a certain target difficulty is found.

Key Issue: What is the mathematics supporting the functionality? PoW relies on one-way hash functions (typically SHA-256) and the difficulty of finding specific hash outputs. The difficulty is adjusted dynamically to maintain a consistent block time.

2. Name of Algorithm: Proof of Stake (PoS)

Definition

A consensus mechanism where validators are chosen to create new blocks based on the amount of cryptocurrency they "stake" as collateral.

Proof of Stake (PoS) is an alternative consensus mechanism where validators are chosen to create new blocks based on the amount of cryptocurrency they "stake" as collateral. PoS aims to achieve consensus in a more energy-efficient manner than PoW while maintaining security through economic incentives. Validators are selected pseudo-randomly, with the probability of selection proportional to the amount of cryptocurrency they have staked. The mathematical underpinnings of PoS include cryptographic algorithms for random selection, often combined with game theory principles to ensure honest behavior through reward and punishment mechanisms.

Key issue: What does it do? PoS aims to achieve consensus in a more energy-efficient manner than PoW while maintaining security through economic incentives.

Key Issue: How does it do it? Validators are selected pseudo-randomly, with the probability of selection proportional to the amount of cryptocurrency they have staked.

Key Issue: What is the mathematics supporting the functionality? PoS uses cryptographic algorithms for random selection, often combined with game theory principles to ensure honest behavior through reward and punishment mechanisms.

3. Name of Algorithm: Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS)

Definition

A variant of PoS where token holders vote for a limited number of delegates responsible for validating transactions and creating blocks.

Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) is a variant of PoS where token holders vote for a limited number of delegates responsible for validating transactions and creating blocks. DPoS aims to increase scalability and transaction speed while maintaining a degree of decentralization through the voting mechanism. In this system, token holders vote for delegates, with voting power proportional to their stake. The elected delegates then take turns producing blocks in a round-robin fashion. DPoS employs voting algorithms and reputation systems, often incorporating concepts from game theory to incentivize honest behavior among delegates.

Key issue: What does it do? DPoS aims to increase scalability and transaction speed while maintaining a degree of decentralization through the voting mechanism.

Key Issue: How does it do it? Token holders vote for delegates, with voting power proportional to their stake. The elected delegates then take turns producing blocks in a round-robin fashion.

Key Issue: What is the mathematics supporting the functionality? DPoS uses voting algorithms and reputation systems, often incorporating concepts from game theory to incentivize honest behavior among delegates.


4. Name of Algorithm: Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT)

Definition

A consensus algorithm designed to work efficiently in asynchronous systems and tolerate Byzantine faults (malicious or faulty nodes).

Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) is a consensus algorithm designed to work efficiently in asynchronous systems and tolerate Byzantine faults, which include malicious or faulty nodes. PBFT ensures consensus in a distributed system even when some nodes are unreliable or potentially malicious. It achieves this through a multi-round voting process where nodes agree on the state of the system, with a supermajority (typically 2/3) required for consensus. The mathematical foundation of PBFT relies on principles from distributed systems theory and Byzantine fault tolerance, using cryptographic signatures and message authentication codes to ensure message integrity.

Key issue: What does it do? PBFT ensures consensus in a distributed system even when some nodes are unreliable or potentially malicious.

Key Issue: How does it do it? Nodes go through a multi-round voting process to agree on the state of the system, with a supermajority (typically 2/3) required for consensus.

Key Issue: What is the mathematics supporting the functionality? PBFT relies on principles from distributed systems theory and Byzantine fault tolerance, using cryptographic signatures and message authentication codes to ensure message integrity.

5. Name of Algorithm: Proof of Authority (PoA)

Definition

A consensus mechanism where a set of pre-approved validators are responsible for creating new blocks and maintaining the network.

Proof of Authority (PoA) is a consensus mechanism where a set of pre-approved validators are responsible for creating new blocks and maintaining the network. PoA provides a highly scalable and energy-efficient consensus mechanism for permissioned blockchains. In this system, approved validators take turns producing blocks in a round-robin fashion, with their real-world identity at stake as collateral. PoA utilizes cryptographic algorithms for block production and validation, often incorporating reputation systems and time-based rotation schemes to ensure fairness and security.

Key issue: What does it do? PoA provides a highly scalable and energy-efficient consensus mechanism for permissioned blockchains.

Key Issue: How does it do it? Approved validators take turns producing blocks in a round-robin fashion, with their real-world identity at stake as collateral.

Key Issue: What is the mathematics supporting the functionality? PoA uses cryptographic algorithms for block production and validation, often incorporating reputation systems and time-based rotation schemes.




Read More
Wall Ztreet Journal Wall Ztreet Journal

“We live here.”

Code used in Vail

————————

While in Vail … .. .

[Code used in restaurants sitting back to back in a booth so you receive local treatment.]

Coordinates: 39°39'1.28"N 106°23'26.34"W

Read More
Understanding Technology: Blockchain vs. Distributed Ledger
Wall Ztreet Journal Wall Ztreet Journal

Understanding Technology: Blockchain vs. Distributed Ledger

Recommended soundtrack: Run Through The Jungle, Credence

Distributed Ledger and Block Chain

A digital database known as a distributed ledger system is a technological approach to recording and sharing data across multiple participants or "nodes" in a network. Here are the key characteristics:

1. Digital: It exists entirely in electronic form, without physical copies.


2. Distributed: The database is spread across multiple computers or nodes, rather than being stored in a single central location.


3. Synchronized: All copies of the database are kept in sync, so each participant has an up-to-date version.


4. Consensus-based: Changes to the database must be agreed upon by the network participants according to predefined rules.


5. Secure: It uses cryptography to ensure data integrity and prevent unauthorized changes.


6. Transparent: Participants can view the entire history of transactions or changes.


7. Decentralized: No single entity has full control over the database.

This type of system is used for various applications where multiple parties need a shared, trustworthy record of transactions or information. It's particularly useful in scenarios where transparency, security, and elimination of intermediaries are important. Blockchain is one well-known type of distributed ledger system, but there are others that use different structures and consensus mechanisms.
Would you like more information on how distributed ledger systems work or their applications ?

Differences between Distributed Ledger and Blockchain

Distributed Ledger and Blockchain are often used interchangeably, but there are some key differences between the two concepts.
A distributed ledger is a broader term that refers to a digital database or record of transactions that is shared, replicated, and synchronized across multiple sites, institutions, or geographies. The defining characteristic of a distributed ledger is that it has no central administrator or central data storage. Instead, the ledger is maintained by a distributed network of participants (nodes) who collectively validate and record the transactions.

In contrast, blockchain is a specific type of distributed ledger technology. Blockchain is characterized by its unique data structure, where transactions are grouped into blocks that are chained together in a chronological order using cryptographic hashes. Each new block contains a reference to the previous block, creating an immutable chain of records. This blockchain structure is what gives blockchain its key properties, such as transparency, immutability, and decentralization.

Not all distributed ledgers use the blockchain data structure. Other distributed ledger architectures, such as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) or block-lattice structures, have also been developed. These alternative designs may offer different capabilities and trade-offs compared to the traditional blockchain model.

Blockchain Vendors

The blockchain vendor ecosystem is diverse and includes a range of companies offering various blockchain-based products and services. Some of the key blockchain vendors include:


1. Enterprise Blockchain Platforms: Major technology companies like IBM, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services, and Oracle offer enterprise-grade blockchain platforms and services.


2. Blockchain-as-a-Service (BaaS) Providers: Vendors such as IBM, Microsoft Azure, and Amazon Web Services provide BaaS offerings, allowing businesses to easily build and deploy blockchain applications without the need to set up and maintain the underlying infrastructure.


3. Blockchain Development Companies: Specialized blockchain development firms like Consensys, Ethereum Foundation, and Hyperledger provide consulting, development, and integration services to help businesses implement blockchain solutions.


4. Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Infrastructure Providers:
Companies like Blockchain.com, Coinbase, and Ripple offer infrastructure, wallets, and other services for the cryptocurrency and blockchain ecosystem.


5. Industry-Specific Blockchain Vendors: Some vendors focus on developing blockchain solutions tailored to specific industries, such as supply chain management, healthcare, finance, or real estate.


6. Open-Source Blockchain Platforms: Projects like Ethereum, Hyperledger, and Corda provide open-source blockchain frameworks and tools for developers to build decentralized applications.


7. Blockchain Consulting and Advisory Firms: Firms like Accenture, Deloitte, and PwC offer blockchain-related consulting, strategy, and implementation services to help businesses navigate the technology.
These vendors collectively contribute to the growth and adoption of blockchain technology across various industries and use cases, providing the necessary infrastructure, tools, and expertise to enable blockchain-based

Read More
Wall Ztreet Journal Wall Ztreet Journal

Market Report: Warehouse Management System (WMS)

Recommended soundtrack: They Say I’m Different, Betty Davis

Market Size

The Warehouse Management System Market is projected to grow from $5.7 billion in 2022 to $11.2 billion by 2027, at a CAGR of 14.3%.

——-
Warehouse Technology Ecosystem


The warehouse technology ecosystem is a comprehensive landscape that encompasses a wide range of solutions and services designed to optimize warehouse operations, inventory management, and logistics. This ecosystem is composed of several interconnected components, each playing a crucial role in enabling efficient and innovative warehouse management.


Warehouse & Inventory Management Software


This component includes software solutions that enable the seamless management of warehouse operations and inventory. These solutions provide features such as real-time inventory tracking, order fulfillment, warehouse organization, and workforce management. They empower warehouse managers to streamline their processes, improve visibility, and make data-driven decisions.

Key players in this segment include Shiphero, Tradegecko, Peoplevox, Fishbowl, Comdash, Logfire, and Salestwarps.


Unique Value

Warehouse & Inventory Management Software solutions enhance operational efficiency, reduce errors, and provide valuable insights to optimize warehouse performance, inventory control, and overall productivity.

———


Warehouse Robotics


The warehouse robotics segment focuses on the integration of automated systems and materials handling technologies to improve warehouse operations. These solutions include autonomous mobile robots, automated storage and retrieval systems, and other advanced warehouse automation tools. By leveraging robotics, warehouse operators can increase throughput, reduce labor costs, and enhance workplace safety.

Notable players in this space include Aethon, Magazino, Clearpath, Arkrobot, Fetch, 6 River Systems, and Balyo.


Unique Value

Warehouse Robotics enable greater operational efficiency, improved accuracy, and enhanced safety, allowing warehouse operators to scale their operations and meet growing customer demands.

——-

Worker Wearables


This component encompasses wearable technologies designed to empower and assist warehouse workers in their daily tasks. These solutions include smart glasses, exoskeletons, and other wearable devices that can improve ergonomics, enhance productivity, and reduce the risk of workplace injuries.

Key players in this segment include GETVU, KINETIC, ATHEER, and XOEYE.

Unique Value

Worker Wearables boost worker productivity, reduce physical strain, and enhance safety, creating a more efficient and empowered warehouse workforce.

——-

Packing


The packing segment focuses on solutions that optimize the packaging and shipping processes within the warehouse. These solutions can include automated packaging systems, weight and volume optimization tools, and integrated shipping label printing. Grabit is a notable player in this space, offering packing solutions that streamline the order fulfillment process.


Unique Value

Packing solutions enhance the speed, accuracy, and efficiency of the packaging and shipping operations, enabling faster order turnaround and reduced shipping costs.

Asset Tracking


This component encompasses technologies that provide real-time visibility and monitoring of warehouse assets, including equipment, inventory, and personnel. Companies like Sewio and Scandit offer asset tracking solutions that leverage IoT sensors, RFID, and other technologies to optimize asset utilization and improve overall warehouse management.


Unique Value

Asset Tracking solutions enable warehouse operators to maintain tight control over their assets, optimize resource allocation, and enhance inventory visibility, ultimately leading to improved operational efficiency and reduced costs.

——-
On-Demand Warehouse Space


This segment focuses on providing flexible, scalable, and on-demand access to warehouse space and related services. Companies like Flexe and CB Insights offer platforms that connect businesses with available warehouse capacity, enabling them to rapidly scale their operations as needed without the burden of long-term leases or infrastructure investments.


Unique Value

On-Demand Warehouse Space solutions offer agility, cost-effectiveness, and scalability, allowing businesses to respond quickly to fluctuating market demands and seasonal peaks without the constraints of traditional warehouse ownership or long-term commitments.

——-

Outsourced Warehousing & Fulfillment


This component encompasses providers of outsourced warehousing, inventory management, and order fulfillment services. These companies offer end-to-end logistics solutions, including storage, picking, packing, and shipping, allowing businesses to focus on their core competencies while leveraging the expertise and infrastructure of specialized logistics providers.

Key players in this segment include Holisol, goJavas, FSC, ShipBob, Parcelninja, Selery, Ecom Express, and Delhivery.


Unique Value

Outsourced Warehousing & Fulfillment services enable businesses to scale their operations, improve delivery times, and enhance customer satisfaction without the need for significant capital investments or in-house logistics expertise.


This comprehensive warehouse technology ecosystem empowers businesses to optimize their warehouse operations, streamline logistics, and drive innovation in the rapidly evolving world of supply chain management.

——-

Vendor Appendix

Warehouse & Inventory Management Software

Shiphero
Tradegecko
Peoplevox
Fishbowl
Comdash
Logfire
Salestwarps

Warehouse Robotics

Aethon
Magazino
Clearpath
Arkrobot
Fetch
6 River Systems
Balyo

Worker Wearables

GETVU
KINETIC
ATHEER
XOEYE

Packing

Grabit

Asset Tracking

Sewio
Scandit

On-Demand Warehouse Space

Flexe
CB Insights

Outsourced Warehousing & Fulfillment

Holisol
goJavas
FSC
ShipBob
Parcelninja
Selery
Ecom Express
Delhivery

Read More
Market Report: Transportation Management Systems (TMS)
Wall Ztreet Journal Wall Ztreet Journal

Market Report: Transportation Management Systems (TMS)

Recommended soundtrack: Spirit In The Sky, Norman Greenbaum

Market Size
$11.36 Billion USD in 2022 and is projected to reach $ 37.31 Billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 14.1% from 2023 to 2030.

AI-Driven Autonomous Supply Chain Optimization

By 2030, 60% of Fortune 500 companies will implement AI-driven autonomous supply chain ecosystems, where TMS solutions negotiate, collaborate, and execute transactions with other AI systems without human intervention, optimizing for cost, speed, sustainability, and real-time market demands.

(Probability: 0.85)

Jake Lebinski
Senior Director, IBIDG

(Use your company’s expense report to purchase a subscription)


Appendix:
Comprehensive List of Transportation Management System (TMS) Vendors

1. 3GTMS (3G-TM) - 3G-TM (2013)
2. 3PL Links - 3PL Links TMS (2011)
3. 4flow - 4flow vista (2000)
4. Allotrac - Allotrac TMS (2009)
5. Alpega TMS - Alpega TMS (2017, merger of Inet and Transwide)
6. AndSoft - e-TMS (1996)
7. Apsis Solutions - Apsis TMS (2008)
8. AscendTMS - InMotion Global TMS (2005)
9. Averitt Express - Averitt TMS (1971)
10. Blue Yonder (formerly JDA Software) - Blue Yonder TMS (1985)
11. C.H. Robinson (TMC) - Navisphere (1905)
12. Cario - Cario TMS (2016)
13. Centerity - Centerity Cloud TMS (2004)
14. Cloud Logistics - Cloud Logistics TMS (2011)
15. Descartes Systems Group - Descartes Transportation Manager (1981)
16. E2open - E2open TMS (2000)
17. Efreightsolutions - EFS TMS (2010)
18. Eyefreight TMS - Eyefreight TMS (2008)
19. Flexis - Flexis TMS (1999)
20. Freightera - Freightera TMS (2014)
21. Fretron - Fretron TMS (2017)
22. Generix Group - Generix Supply Chain TMS (1990)
23. Gillion - Gillion TMS (2011)
24. GTG Technology Group - GTG TMS (2008)
25. Haven TMS - Haven TMS (2014)
26. Highjump - Highjump TMS (1983)
27. Hollisol Logistics - HolliTMS (1989)
28. IBM - IBM Sterling TMS (1911)
29. InMotion Global - AscendTMS (2005)
30. Inet TMS - Alpega TMS (1999)
31. Infor Nexus TMS - Infor Nexus TMS (2018)
32. IntelliTrans - IntelliTrans TMS (1992)
33. Kinaxis - Kinaxis RapidResponse TMS (1984)
34. Kuebix TMS - Kuebix TMS (2008)
35. Locus - Locus TMS (2015)
36. Logility - Logility Voyager TMS (1996)
37. Logisuite - Logisuite TMS (2001)
38. Made4net - Made4net TransportExpert (2005)
39. Magaya - Magaya Supply Chain TMS (2001)
40. Manhattan Associates - Manhattan TMS (1990)
41. MercuryGate International - MercuryGate TMS (2000)
42. Navitrans - Navitrans TMS (1999)
43. Nimbuspost - Nimbuspost TMS (2018)
44. Nulogx - Nulogx TMS (1998)
45. Omnitracs - Omnitracs TMS (1988)
46. One Network Enterprises - One Network TMS (2002)
47. Oracle (Oracle Transportation Management - OTM) - Oracle TMS (1977)
48. PCS Software - PCS TMS (1997)
49. Peregrine - Peregrine TMS (2016)
50. Precision Software - QAD Precision TMS (1984)
51. QAD Precision - QAD Precision TMS (1984)
52. Railinc - RailSight (1998)
53. Ramco Systems - Ramco TMS (1999)
54. Revenova - Revenova TMS (2015)
55. RMI - RMI ExpressWay (1987)
56. SaaS Transportation - SaaS Transportation TMS (2012)
57. SAP (SAP Transportation Management - SAP TM) - SAP TM (1972)
58. ShipHawk - ShipHawk TMS (2012)
59. Softlink Global - Softlink Global TMS (2005)
60. Solata Tech - Solata TMS (2015)
61. Superprocure - Superprocure TMS (2012)
62. SwanLeap - SwanLeap TMS (2013)
63. Teknowlogi - Tai TMS (2008)
64. TMSFirst - TMSFirst TMS (2016)
65. TMSA - TMSA TMS (2003)
66. TMW Systems - TMW TMS (1983)
67. Track-POD - Track-POD TMS (2012)
68. Transplace - Transplace TMS (2000)
69. Transpace - Transpace TMS (2008)
70. TransportGistics - TransportGistics TMS (2000)
71. Trimble Transportation - Trimble TMS (1978)
72. Trucklogics - Trucklogics TMS (2015)
73. U Route - U Route TMS (2016)
74. Ultra TMS - Ultra TMS (2001)
75. Vrogue - Vrogue TMS (2019)
76. Zuum - Zuum TMS (2016)

Read More
Trasure Island, Jamaica
Wall Ztreet Journal Wall Ztreet Journal

Trasure Island, Jamaica

Recommended soundtrack: Highway Tune, Greta Van Fleet

Key Issue: Where is there venture funding in Jamaica ?

Treasure Beach, Saint Elizabeth Parish, Jamaica

Treasure Beach is a small fishing village on the southern coast of Jamaica, known for its scenic beaches, laid-back atmosphere, and community-based tourism initiatives. Some key facts about this location:

* Latitude: 17°59'17.39"N

* Longitude: 77°50'6.56"W

* Part of the parish of Saint Elizabeth in southwestern Jamaica


* Popular destination for its calm, beautiful beaches and lack of large resort developments


* Home to several small hotels, guesthouses, and eco-lodges catering to visitors


* Fishing and farming are important local industries


* Relatively untouched by mass tourism compared to other parts of Jamaica's coast


* Offers opportunities for hiking, birdwatching, and exploring the island's natural environment

Read More
Wall Ztreet Journal Wall Ztreet Journal

Market Report: Order Management Systems (OMS)

Recommended soundtrack: Monkey Man, Rolling Stones

Autonomous Supply Chain Ecosystems

By 2036, over 40% of Fortune 500 companies will operate within fully autonomous supply chain ecosystems, where AI-driven OMS systems negotiate, collaborate, and execute transactions with other AI systems without human intervention, optimizing for factors including cost, speed, sustainability, and real-time market demands.

(Probability: 0.75)

Jake Lebinski

Senior Director, IBIDG

(Use your company’s expense report to purchase a subscription)

Vendors:

1. Kibo Commerce
2. Mintsoft
3. Shopify
4. NetSuite
5. Complexica
6. Omnifynd
7. Anchanto
8. eSwap
9. Diffagency
10. Portfolio BI
11. Savoye
12.Envista
13. fabric
14. Hashmicro
15. Unbrick
16. SoftwareAdvice (InfiPlex)
17. Openbravo
18. Teamwork Commerce
19. VTEX
20. Gluo
21. Cin7
22. Sigmainfo
23. Marello
24. Webscoot
25. Royal Cyber (Salesforce OMS)
26. Oodles (ERP Solutions)
27. Shiprocket
28. Forbytes
29. Sterling Trading Tech
30. Vaimo
31. Comarch
32. Storilabs
33. diCentral
34. Volusion
35. OMS.Pro
36. Milo Retail
37. Comestri
38. Canary7
39. Etnasoft
40. Emerge App
41. Ragic
42. Tigren
43. Folio3 (Microsoft Dynamics)
44. Deck Commerce
45. EvinceRealty
46. SaaS Services (Axiom)
47. Spectrum Customizer
48. Anchanto
49. BT Techsoft
51. Brightpearl
52. Körber
53. JIBJESS
54. Impargo
55. Hankook Networks

Read More
Company Note: Manhattan Associates
Wall Ztreet Journal Wall Ztreet Journal

Company Note: Manhattan Associates

Manhattan Associates, Inc. (NASDAQ: MANH)
Wall Ztreet Research Note
Rating:
Market Perform

Company Overview


Manhattan Associates is a leading provider of supply chain commerce solutions, offering a comprehensive suite of software and services that enable companies to optimize their supply chain operations and improve efficiency. The company's flagship product is Manhattan Active Warehouse Management, a cloud-native warehouse management system (WMS) that provides advanced capabilities for inventory management, order fulfillment, labor management, and performance analytics. Manhattan Associates also offers a range of integrated solutions for transportation management, order management, and point-of-sale.

Product Strengths


Manhattan Associates' supply chain solutions are widely recognized as best-in-class, offering a powerful combination of functionality, scalability, and flexibility. The company's cloud-native architecture enables customers to easily deploy and scale their supply chain operations, while also benefiting from continuous updates and innovations. Manhattan Associates' solutions are also highly configurable, allowing customers to tailor the software to their specific needs and integrate with existing systems. Additionally, the company's deep domain expertise and strong customer relationships have helped it establish a leading position in the supply chain software market.

Weaknesses


While Manhattan Associates is a leader in the WMS market, it has a less comprehensive offering compared to some of its competitors in the broader supply chain management space. The company's solutions primarily focus on warehouse management, transportation management, and order management, which may limit its ability to capture demand from customers seeking end-to-end supply chain visibility and optimization. Additionally, Manhattan Associates faces intense competition from larger, more diversified software vendors such as SAP, Oracle, and Infor, which offer a wider range of supply chain and logistics solutions.

Read More
Wall Ztreet Journal Wall Ztreet Journal

Market Note: Transportation Management

Transportation Management

Strategic Planning Assumptions

1. Adoption

By 2037, 90% of Fortune 1,000 companies will adopt AI-driven, cloud-based TMS platforms, resulting in a 14-20 % reduction in overall logistics costs and a 15- 25% improvement in on-time delivery rates.

The widespread adoption will drive the global TMS market to reach $100 billion, with AI-powered solutions accounting for 75% of the market share. Simultaneously, these advanced TMS platforms will enable a 1-5% reduction in carbon emissions across the logistics sector, aligning with global sustainability goals.


2. End-to-end Supply Chain Visibility Solutions


By 2027, end-to-end supply chain visibility solutions will be adopted by 70% of global logistics providers, improving on-time delivery rates to 99%+ and reducing transit times by 18-22%.

(Probability .80)


2. Real-time Dynamic Routing


By 2025, 75% of transportation management systems will incorporate machine learning for real-time dynamic routing, reducing transportation costs by 12-18% and empty miles by 20-25%.

(Probability .82)



3. Cloud

By 2026, 85% of new TMS implementations will be cloud-based, increasing system flexibility by 40-50% and reducing total cost of ownership by 25-30%.

(Probability .87)

———

Return on Investment and Quick Wins in Transportation Management Systems


For CEOs and CFOs focused on ROI and quick wins, here are the key areas where TMS implementations typically deliver rapid, measurable results:

Route Optimization

ROI: 10-30% reduction in transportation costs within 3-6 months
Quick Win: Immediate reduction in miles driven and fuel costs

Freight Spend Management

ROI: 8-15% reduction in total freight spend within the first year

Quick Win: Rapid identification of lower-cost carriers for high-volume lanes


Shipment Visibility

ROI: 20-30% reduction in customer service inquiries within 3 months

Quick Win: Immediate improvement in proactive issue resolution

Carrier Management

ROI: 5-10% improvement in on-time performance within 6 months

Quick Win: Quick identification and resolution of underperforming carriers


Analytics and Reporting

ROI: 10-15% improvement in overall logistics efficiency within the first year

Quick Win: Immediate insights into cost-saving opportunities

Automated Tendering


ROI: 3-5% reduction in spot market usage within 3 months

Quick Win: Faster tender acceptance and reduced manual work

Invoice Auditing and Payment

ROI: 2-5% savings on freight bills through error detection within 6 months


Quick Win: Immediate identification of billing discrepancies

Inventory Optimization


ROI: 10-20% reduction in safety stock within 6-12 months

Quick Win: Quick identification of slow-moving inventory

Yard Management


ROI: 20-30% reduction in yard congestion within 3-6 months

Quick Win: Immediate improvement in dock scheduling efficiency

Claims Management


ROI: 15-25% reduction in claim resolution time within 6 months

Quick Win: Faster initiation and tracking of claims processes

These ROI figures and quick wins are based on industry averages and case studies. Actual results may vary depending on the size of the organization, current inefficiencies, and the specific TMS solution implemented. However, these areas consistently show rapid improvements and tangible benefits that can be measured and reported to stakeholders early in the TMS adoption process.

Jake Lebinski

Senior Director

Read More
Wall Ztreet Journal Wall Ztreet Journal

Standardization & Logistics Management APIs

Logistics Optimization Strategic Planning Assumption

By 2025, 70% of large logistics companies will standardize on APIs from the top 5 market share leaders in each logistics software category, creating a more interconnected and efficient industry ecosystem. This standardization will lead to a 30% reduction in integration costs and a 25% improvement in cross-platform data accuracy.

(Probability .75)

Key issue:
Are there APIs that exist that are important and not attached to a market leader?

Yes, there are several important APIs in logistics optimization that may not be directly attached to market leaders:


a) Shipping Carrier APIs: APIs from carriers like UPS, FedEx, DHL, which are crucial for rate shopping and tracking.

b) Map and Geocoding APIs: Google Maps API, Mapbox, or

c) OpenStreetMap APIs for location-based services.

d) Weather APIs: Important for route optimization and risk management.

e) Customs and Trade Compliance APIs: For international logistics and trade.

f) IoT Device APIs: From various IoT manufacturers for real-time tracking and monitoring.

g) Payment Gateway APIs: For financial transactions in logistics.

h) Open-source logistics APIs: Like OpenTripPlanner for multi-modal routing.

Read More

Beatitudo est status mentis qui rationem et cogitationem componit

-

Sign up for IBIDG’s newsletter and you’ll be awesome (Probability .89)